John Norman
Automatically compiled listing. Details may contain errors.Partner at Gowling WLG
- Called to the bar
- 2003
- Languages
- English
Intellectual PropertyPartner at Gowling WLG
Intellectual PropertyJohn Norman is a partner in Gowling WLG's Ottawa office who litigates patent disputes for multinational life sciences and technology companies. A lot of that work runs across several patents at once and turns on small molecules, vaccines or biologics, and Norman has led small molecule and biologic disputes brought under Canada's PM(NOC) Regulations. The Federal Court of Canada, the Federal Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada are all regular stops.
Science came first. Norman earned a BSc and an MSc at Memorial University of Newfoundland, then a PhD in Biochemistry at Dalhousie University, where an LLB followed. Called to the Ontario bar in 2003, Norman is ranked in Chambers Canada for Intellectual Property: Litigation and was named Best Lawyers' 2027 "Lawyer of the Year" in Ottawa for Biotechnology and Life Sciences Practice.
Not every file ends up in court. Pharmaceutical clients also bring Norman in to shape business strategies meant to hold up when sophisticated challengers come at them from several directions, and to weigh in on regulatory exclusivity, from data protection and certificates of supplementary protection to which patents get listed. On top of client work, the partner co-heads Gowling WLG's Switzerland country desk, building Canada-Swiss links in life sciences and technology.
BIOTECanada has been part of the picture for years. Norman sat on its Board of Directors from 2013 to 2022, was one of the organization's counsel when it intervened at the Supreme Court of Canada in Merck Frosst Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Health), and served on the advisory group for its 2025 Gold Leaf Awards. You'll also see Norman speaking and writing about patent litigation strategy in pharma and tech.
Multi-patent cases involving small molecules, vaccines and biologics, including proceedings under the PM(NOC) Regulations and section 8 damages claims. Recent matters include Novartis v. Apotex over JAKAVI and Taro v. Biogen over FAMPYRA.
The practice reaches well beyond drugs. Norman's representative work includes Bauer Hockey v. Sport Maska disputes over hockey skates and an anti-concussion helmet, a battery charger circuit board case, and a CHEO matter on whether gene sequences and test methods can be patented.
Advice to pharmaceutical companies on patent listing, regulatory data protection and certificates of supplementary protection, along with business strategies designed to stand up to challenges from sophisticated competitors.
Norman was among counsel for the intervener BIOTECanada. The Court dismissed the appeals with costs, with three judges dissenting.
Decisions where John Norman appeared as counsel, from public court records. Past cases don't predict future results.
Something wrong with this listing? Tell us and we’ll hide it right away while we review your request, then correct it or take it down.
Add the free LawOnline listing badge to your website. It tells visitors you’re listed in an independent Canadian lawyer directory and links back to this profile. Being listed isn’t a certification or an endorsement, and the badge doesn’t mean we’ve checked your credentials.
This listing was generated by AI from public sources in October 2026. It may contain errors, and we can’t guarantee it’s accurate or complete. Before you rely on anything here, verify it on their firm’s website. Confirm John Norman’s licence and standing in the Law Society of Ontario directory ↗
How this data is compiled and checked · Correct or remove this listing