Yoon Kang
Automatically compiled listing. Details may contain errors.Principal at Smart & Biggar
- Called to the bar
- 1995
- Languages
- English
Intellectual PropertyPrincipal at Smart & Biggar
Intellectual PropertyDrug companies facing complex patent fights at the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal often have Yoon Kang as lead counsel, including in proceedings under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations. Kang's a Principal with Smart & Biggar in Toronto, in the life sciences litigation group. Outside court, the work means advising pharmaceutical innovators from around the world and research institutions on their patent rights, whether the invention is a small molecule drug or a biologic.
Kang's a Fellow of the Intellectual Property Institute of Canada and a former co-chair of the Canadian Bar Association's Patents and Industrial Design Committee. There've also been talks on Canadian pharma patents in Boston and Amsterdam, and teaching sessions at Osgoode Professional Development and the University of Toronto's law school.
Science came first. Before finishing a law degree at the University of Toronto in 1993, Kang earned a bachelor's in microbiology and genetics and then a master's in molecular biology and medical genetics at the same school. The Ontario call followed in 1995, the same year as registration as a patent agent and as a trademark agent, and Kang's also registered to practise before the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
One appeal shaped Canadian patent law. Kang and the team took AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc to the Supreme Court of Canada, and in 2017 the court threw out the so-called promise doctrine and set out what utility actually requires for a Canadian patent.
Kang acts as lead counsel for pharmaceutical clients in complex patent cases at the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal. That includes proceedings under the Patented Medicines (Notice of Compliance) Regulations.
Global drug innovators and research institutions get advice on every side of their patent rights, covering both small molecule and biologics inventions.
Kang was counsel for AstraZeneca on the appeal. The court rejected the promise doctrine, clarified the utility requirement for Canadian patents and upheld the NEXIUM patent as useful.
Decisions where Yoon Kang appeared as counsel, from public court records. Past cases don't predict future results.
Something wrong with this listing? Tell us and we’ll hide it right away while we review your request, then correct it or take it down.
Add the free LawOnline listing badge to your website. It tells visitors you’re listed in an independent Canadian lawyer directory and links back to this profile. Being listed isn’t a certification or an endorsement, and the badge doesn’t mean we’ve checked your credentials.
This listing was generated by AI from public sources in October 2026. It may contain errors, and we can’t guarantee it’s accurate or complete. Before you rely on anything here, verify it on their firm’s website. Confirm Yoon Kang’s licence and standing in the Law Society of Ontario directory ↗
How this data is compiled and checked · Correct or remove this listing